In the face of an escalating climate change threat, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) actively champions the spirit of green and low-carbon development, advocating for a sustainable future. 

As the recent BRI white paper released by China's State Council points out, the BRI embraces the global trend of green and low-carbon development, emphasizes respect for and protection of nature, and respects the right of all parties to pursue sustainable and eco-friendly growth.

Despite vicious campaigns launched by certain Western media outlets to smear the BRI as causing environmental damage in other countries, analysts noted that the real fact is that by making use of the expertise in renewable energy, energy conservation, environmental protection, and clean energy production, and employing Chinese technology, products, and experience, China actively promotes BRI cooperation in green development.

During visits by Global Times reporters to various BRI project sites worldwide, it became evident that Chinese enterprises prioritize environmental conservation measures when conducting operations abroad. Meanwhile, there is an increasing uptake of Chinese energy products in Belt and Road countries transported by rail and air, effectively harnessing renewable resources like wind and solar energy.

Taking the cooperation between China and Fiji as an example, in 2014, China and Fiji established the South-South cooperation to address climate change. In May 2022, the two countries signed a bilateral MOU on the Provision of Goods under the South-South Cooperation for Addressing Climate Change. 

Chinese Ambassador to Fiji Zhou Jian told the Global Times that China and Fiji are both victims of climate change, as well as allies in addressing climate change. 

Analysts pointed out that the cooperation between China and Fiji is a shining example of the green BRI. The Belt and Road Initiative Action Plan not only laid out the overarching vision and framework of the BRI but also underscored the paramount significance of environmental preservation and sustainability within BRI projects.

Furthermore, China, in conjunction with BRI participant nations, has established comprehensive frameworks for the implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Guidelines for BRI projects. These guidelines have proven instrumental in ensuring that environmental considerations are integrated into the planning and execution of projects.

China has also extended its commitment to environmentally sustainable BRI initiatives through various international agreements and partnerships. This includes the signing of an MOU with the United Nations Environment Programme, aimed at fostering a green Belt and Road from 2017 to 2022. Additionally, China has entered into environmental cooperation accords with over 30 countries and international organizations. Furthermore, in collaboration with various nations, China launched the Initiative for Belt and Road Partnership on Green Development. It has also played a pivotal role in establishing the BRI International Green Development Coalition, boasting more than 150 partners from over 40 countries, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

The 2023 Basketball Game for Foreigners commenced recently in Beijing. The game was co-organized by the Foreign Affairs Office of the People's Government of Beijing Municipality and the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Sports. 

Nearly 30 expatriates from 17 countries such as Japan, United States, Brazil, South Korea, Zambia, and other countries participated in the match.

The Mongolian Embassy in China, five universities including the University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), and the Beijing-Japanese Club Basketball Association (Beijing 56°ers) formed eight teams to participate in the competition.

The event has been held for six consecutive years, with a high reputation among embassies and expatriates, and has so far seen more than 60 teams with about 1,400 expatriates in Beijing participate in the tournament, to an audience of 20,000 local and international spectators. 

This is the first time that this year's basketball tournament has been included in a Beijing-level social basketball activity, the Beijing Second Community Cup Basketball League Three-Person Basketball Tournament.

Zolboo Enkbold from the Mongolian Embassy in China expressed his excitement at participating in matches with all the teams, and commended the activity for being carefully organized with a warm atmosphere geared toward the enrichment of the cultural and sports lives of expatriates in Beijing.

Alexandre, a Mozambican student from the USTB, said it was his first time to participate in a three-player basketball tournament in Beijing, for which he was very happy, and he hoped to continue to actively participate in similar activities in the future.

Monday marks the 22nd anniversary of the September 11 attacks. On Monday, National Public Radio (NPR) published an article titled "For a new generation of Marines, 9/11 is history." The article mentioned, "For many Americans, 9/11 is now simply a date to mark, much like December 7 with the Pearl Harbor attacks." 

Americans have not learned the lessons of the 9/11 attacks after 22 years. Instead, they shift the focus of the country's national security strategy from fighting terrorism to focusing on great power competition. They have abandoned the most effective way of combating terrorism: great power collaboration in favor of great power competition. This is unfortunate for the US.

The article also mentions that Americans are engaging in "an exercise of forgetting," quoting Carter Malkasian, who chairs the defense analysis department at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. He says September 11 isn't spoken about much nowadays. He goes on to say that there is "a recognition among nearly everyone across ranks and civilian positions that we all need to focus on China and Russia."

The US' continuous attitude reveals that without question it's a unique nation that feeds on instability and confrontation, and its hegemonic status is difficult to demonstrate in the absence of an adversary. Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times, "It is obvious that the US military is making every effort to create an enemy for the American public and society. Their characteristic is that they have to create enemies if there are none." Over the past 22 years, the US has increasingly solidified this mindset, which has trapped them in a vicious cycle of making one major mistake after another. At the same time, due to the global scale of the US, its tragedy inevitably spreads worldwide. This is not only a tragedy for the US itself but also the world.

The American politicians, who are locked in this vicious cycle, continue to think in bellicose, hegemonic ways to advance their own short-term political interests. They continue to shape distorted perceptions among the American people, ignoring history and focusing only on the "future threats" they deliberately create.

For the American people who experienced the 9/11 attacks, this pain is indelible. It is important for the younger generation in America to reflect on this event and prevent similar tragedies from happening again. However, their worldview is also being shaped by certain American politicians for their own political interests. Their reflections on 9/11 are also being washed away by these "self-interests."

Diao Daming, Deputy Director of the US Research Center at Renmin University of China, told the Global Times, "The current political narrative of American politicians is very dangerous. The US has shifted the focus of the problem from terrorism to great power competition, with the aim of covering up domestic divisions." Unlike the "war on terror" that united the country, the two major parties in the US now have irreconcilable differences in social welfare, military spending, minority-related politics, and other areas. American politicians are pointing overseas, hoping to achieve their political goals by deceiving the public and avoiding addressing the real problems within the US.

However, this approach is like drinking poison to quench your thirst. The effect of American politicians hyping up the China-related issue is very limited and only exacerbates the ongoing accumulation of social woes in the US. This is extremely irresponsible for the American people. China is not a remedy for America's internal turmoil. Using China as a scapegoat whenever there is a problem not only harms the US itself but also poses a threat to the world. If the US continues to persist in this way, its self-destructive path will not be too far off. The containment strategy that the US is implementing against China today will not succeed. Its failed trade war with China is as clear as its disastrous defeat in the war in Afghanistan. The actual resistance it faces in actively building an anti-China alliance far outweighs any formal gains. The end of the war in Afghanistan may allow the US to allocate some resources toward dealing with China, but it cannot change the tide of the times. 

Some commentators have analyzed how the 20 years after the 9/11 attacks turned the US into a declining great power with a tarnished reputation. Arrogantly believing that waging wars can reshape the world, the US has gradually pushed itself into a declining abyss. American politicians fail to reflect on the lessons learned and, despite leaving behind numerous "messes" internationally with their "military counterterrorism" efforts, they selfishly shift their strategic focus from "counterterrorism" to "great power competition" and aggressively suppress China and Russia, attempting to create more troubles. The US hopes to continue maintaining its hegemonic status, but the decline of American-style hegemony is an inevitable law of historical development.

Influenced by the US' strategic competition against China, some Western countries have clearly become hostile toward China in recent years. South Korea and Australia, as two typical "middle powers" of similar economic scale which have close trade ties with China, are both US allies in the Asia-Pacific region, and their relations with China have deteriorated for some time. However, the recent "ice-breaking" of China-Australia relations and the continuous "freezing" of China-South Korea relations are in stark contrast.

Recently, China and Australia have witnessed warming ties. Amid the East Asia Summit, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed on September 7 that he will visit China later this year after talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, with both sides agreeing to resume exchanges in various fields. As leader of the Labor Party, Albanese has shown a different stance toward China from his predecessors since he came to power last year. On the same day, the 7th China-Australia High-Level Dialogue was held in Beijing, the first in three years. It is noticed that the Australian delegation covers all sectors of politics, business, academia and the media, with many former politicians from both the Liberal and Labor parties in attendance. This is seen as a consensus between the two parties of Australia to improve relations with China.

Australia's shift has been very positive. However, the same cannot be said about South Korea's performance. Since coming to power in May last year, the Yoon Suk-yeol administration has focused on the South Korea-US alliance, highlighting the "values" orientation of its foreign policy and displaying a distinctive "pro-US" tendency. With regards to its relations with China, the Yoon administration blatantly interferes in the Taiwan question and attempts to follow the US and Japan in terms of the South China Sea issue. These moves have further led to tension and a standstill between Beijing and Seoul.

The Yoon administration, perhaps realizing that its policy toward China is too paranoid, has recently tried to send positive messages to China. In the meeting with Premier Li, Yoon emphasized that the South Korean side is willing to work with China to practice multilateralism and free trade and promote the stable and healthy development of the South Korea-China relationship. However, so far, these signals released by South Korea have not yet been put into practice.

Looking back at the China-South Korea and China-Australia relations over the years, the turning point occurred after the change of government in South Korea and Australia last year. After the Australian Labor administration came to power, it made adjustments to the anti-China "microphone diplomacy" of its predecessor under Scott Morrison and sent out frequent signals to repair relations with China. Therefore, the leaders of the two countries met during the G20 summit in Bali, Indonesia in November last year, which promoted the improvement in bilateral relations.

In contrast, the Yoon administration, which also came to power last year, took the opposite approach, changing the previously balanced route between the US and China to the "pro-US" orientation, which caused the deterioration of its ties with China.

The impact of such two different policy orientations is prominent. From January to July this year, China-South Korea bilateral trade fell 16.6 percent year-on-year. Some analysts said that the negative effects of South Korea's policy of following the US and "decoupling" from China are becoming apparent. Meanwhile, bilateral trade between China and Australia saw an increase of 5.4 percent year-on-year, which is particularly striking against the backdrop of a general slowdown in the global economy. Clearly the improvement of political relations between China and Australia has played a crucial role in boosting bilateral economic and trade ties.

For Seoul and Canberra, there are many similarities in their relationship with Beijing. Both South Korea and Australia have no historical or territorial disputes with China, but have maintained close economic and trade ties. Furthermore, China does not pose any threat to either country. In particular, the Australian and South Korean economies are heavily dependent on trade with China, so stabilizing and developing relations with China is essentially in the national interests of both countries. The latest improvement in China-Australia relations is exactly due to Canberra's return to rather independent and pragmatic policy toward China, which should be an inspiration for the Yoon administration.

As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi put forward during his meeting with the Australian delegation, it is necessary for the two sides to draw useful experience and lessons in the bilateral relations. He urged the two sides to look at each other objectively, calmly and kindly, understand that China and Australia should remain partners rather than rivals, and advance bilateral relations independently and without any influence or interference from any third party. These three points are also helpful suggestions for South Korea.

The author is a research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies.

The South and East China Seas are among China's major security concerns in its neighborhood. Despite this, the US still hypes up competition with China in these regions to cover up the tendency of its hegemonic expansion.

The US Congressional Research Service (CRS) recently published a report which pointed out that the South China Sea in the past 10 to 15 years has become the arena of US-China strategic competition, while actions by China's maritime forces at the Diaoyu Islands in the East China Sea are another concern for US observers. "Chinese domination of China's near-seas region… could substantially affect US strategic, political, and economic interests in the Indo-Pacific region and elsewhere," said the CRS report.

The South and East China Seas hold different strategic positions for China and the US. On one hand, as China's military strength has rapidly progressed, the Chinese navy no longer prioritizes near-shore defense. Instead, it actively and comprehensively seeks to safeguard China's sovereignty and security in these waters. China's activities in the South and East China Seas are among the first indications of its rise as a global power.

On the other hand, the South and East China Seas are at the forefront of US hegemonic power. Despite being geographically distant from these waters, the US still perceives China's near-seas region as a place to show off its military presence and political influence due to the pervasive nature of the US global hegemony. This situation is unlikely to change unless the US hegemonic strategy collapses.

It is evident that the situation in the South and East China Seas has become complicated over the years. Experts told the Global Times that Washington is the biggest driver of the intensifying China-US competition in these regions, noting the US deliberately creates problems in these regions for its own interests. In other words, the US aims to showcase the strength of its hegemony, while simultaneously containing China's development through its Indo-Pacific Strategy.

Managing the China-US competition in those regions has become an urgent yet difficult task. When China's growing determination to protect its national security encounters the US' pursuit for global hegemony in the South and East China Seas, a collision can easily occur. The US will do anything to make sure its needs override China's, leading to the emergence of more confrontations and future deterioration of bilateral relations.

The intense strategic competition between Beijing and Washington in China's near-seas region may also affect policymaking in the US. The CRS is a major congressional think tank under the Library of Congress that serves members of Congress and their committees. Its recent report is obviously intended to clarify congressional responsibilities in the China-US strategic competition in the South and East China Seas, so that Congress can better help Washington gain an advantage over Beijing.

The US Congress has passed bills to institutionalize anti-China activities, which in itself will lead to further tensions in the bilateral relationship. This year, the South China Sea and East China Sea Sanctions Act of 2023 has already been introduced in the Senate; we cannot rule out the possibility that Congress may use more legislative resources against China's development.

But from a strategic point of view, the US actually hopes China's neighbors in the South and East China Seas to fight Beijing at the forefront, while the US provides strategic support from behind. The question is, as Washington's sinister intentions of exploiting its allies and partners become increasingly prominent, how many countries will be willing to pay for US hegemonic strategy?

In the face of the US' intense competition with China in China's neighboring waters, China should, on one hand, strive for a more favorable international environment through diplomatic means to ensure a long-term peaceful and stable surrounding environment conducive to its development.

On the other hand, the country should not neglect the development of its hard power, including military capabilities. During critical moments, China must demonstrate its determination through action to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and interests, making it clear to those who provoke that there is no room for maneuver when it comes to issues involving China's red line.

The one-year anniversary of the unsolved Nord Stream explosions on September 26 is a timely occasion to reflect on one of the largest acts of sabotage in history and the broader geopolitical tensions within which it took place. Several underwater blasts destroyed most of the Nord Stream I and II pipelines that day. Russian gas exports to Germany through the first pipeline were already reduced by that time while the second never entered into operation. 

After the sabotage, Russia and the West predictably blamed each other. Russia argued that the US had a self-interested hegemonic motive in blowing them up in order to undermine the crucial energy component of Russia-Germany relations in parallel with selling more expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) to the EU. The West, meanwhile, couldn't formulate a cogent explanation for why Russia would blow up its own pipelines. 

It wasn't until early February 2023 that some credible leads finally emerged regarding who was responsible. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a detailed report on Substack citing what he described as unnamed Biden Administration officials who allegedly informed him that the US began preparing to destroy the Nord Stream pipelines last summer. The US denied the claims, after which the New York Times reported their own version of this story in early March. According to their unnamed sources, a rogue group of Ukrainians purportedly rented a yacht from Poland that they then used to move professional divers to the site to plant the underwater explosives that later thereafter blew up those pipelines. They were apparently motivated to asymmetrically attack Russia in response to its special operation despite their plans also harming the interests of NATO-member Germany, though many Ukrainians were annoyed with Berlin back then for not sending more arms. 

It remains to be seen whether undeniable evidence will ever emerge and be shared with the public and prove who the guilty party is. Until then, one can only speculate about who was responsible, which is why it's more constructive to look at the consequences of this incident in the year since it happened. 

Russia-Germany relations markedly deteriorated in the aftermath as Berlin finally agreed to dispatch heavy weapons to Ukraine. Europe no longer heavily relies on Russia for oil or gas, and this "decoupling" of their previously strong and strategic ties seems to have led to the continent losing all sense of restraint in this conflict. Almost every country, most of which are also NATO members, has since supplied Ukraine with plenty of arms. 

As a result, Russia-EU relations as a whole deteriorated much further than before upon Russia's ties with Germany, the bloc's largest economy, deteriorating after the Nord Stream explosions. Meanwhile, relations with the US comprehensively strengthened, especially in the energy domain. Accordingly, American influence surged to levels last seen since the height of the Cold War or first few years after World War II. 

These objectively existing outcomes extend credence to Russia's claims of US complicity in last year's incident, which if true, would amount to a de facto declaration of war against its own German NATO ally due to the military nature of what happened. The same also goes if Ukraine were responsible since it too had a motive seek these outcomes. In any case, Russia-Germany relations and especially Russian-EU relations since the start of the special operation decisively changed for the worse since that attack. 

Bearing all this in mind, it can be said that the legacy of the Nord Stream explosions still lingers one year on, and will likely persist across the coming years due to its game-changing consequences. Any hopes of a Russia-Germany rapprochement and thus a Russian-EU rapprochement influenced by Berlin's energy interests, irrespective of conspiratorial speculation of a secret deal between them, were dashed. The EU then fell more fully under the US' influence, which intensified the NATO-Russian proxy war in Ukraine. 

Considering that this outcome worsened that conflict, one can conclude that the continued civilian suffering in Ukraine is partially connected to this incident. Russia's setback in Kherson Region less than two months later in early November, and that which it experienced in Kharkov Region in early September just prior to the Nord Stream attacks, could have in theory provided a chance for Germany to mediate a ceasefire if it was still motivated by the desire to resume gas transit. 

That's not to suggest that it was secretly conspiring with Russia about this before the incident happened, but just that Russia's subsequent setback in the Kharkov Region at the onset of winter might have inspired Germany policymakers to independently explore this possibility if the Nord Stream pipelines were intact. Alas, their destruction led to the preceding hopes being nothing but a thought exercise, though it's still worthwhile wondering in terms of the bigger picture on the one-year anniversary of that attack. 

Out of options. Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

The 23rd China International Industry Fair, which drew to a close on Saturday in Shanghai, attracted over 200,500 visitors from more than 2,800 enterprises across 30 countries and regions, offering a unique platform for domestic and foreign manufacturing companies.

As a window and platform to promote global industrial economic exchange, the fair, which has now been run for 22 years, has attracted higher attendances and publicity. 

The proportion of international brands participating in the exhibition has increased to 30 percent, the organizer said, according to Xinhua. 

Alongside companies from traditional manufacturing powers such as the US, Germany, Japan, and Italy, there were also first-time exhibitors from Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Cuba. In addition, the companies from Italy have further expanded its scale, with the number of exhibitors increasing to 65, an increase of 30 percent over the same period of the previous session.

As the process of industrial digitization accelerates, technologies such as artificial intelligence and industrial Internet are reshaping the global production system.

Zhejiang Sineva Intelligent Technology Co, a tech company aiming to provide mobile robot solutions, displayed the SIBOT series of composite robots that have been recognized by customers in the semiconductor industry.

In 2023, the company has launched a variety of products such as SIBOT series composite robots and W series water tank robots, focusing on the core capabilities of precise handling, connection and transportation, and automatic loading and unloading, to help partners further improve logistics performance and production efficiency.

"We are helping customers improve the digitalization and intelligence level of production and operation links to realize 'Chinese speed'," Liu Changlun, CEO of Zhejiang Sineva, said. 

At the exhibition, Schneider Electric released a white paper on the highly integrated 5G+PLC solutions together with the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology and the China United Network Communications Group Co, which are designed to explore the value arising from the connection between 5G networks and controls. 

It also signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Sunshine Pumps (Tianjin) Co Under the agreement, the two parties will focus on the production and operation of high-end smart devices to explore opportunities for collaboration on digital and software solutions. 

Pang Xingjian, senior vice president and head of industrial automation China of Schneider Electric, said that digital acceleration and sustainable development have become two long-term strategies that are both inseparable and complementary to each other for industrial enterprises: digital solutions underpin sustainable development, whereas sustainable development provides new stages and drivers for digital solutions. 

Xin Guobin, vice minister of industry and information technology said at the opening ceremony on Tuesday that the ministry will work with other parties to foster a world-class business environment that is market-oriented, law-based, and internationalized, continuously deepen international innovation cooperation, and safeguard the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains.

China's idea of building a global community of shared future has broken up the zero-sum mentality of certain Western countries, and illuminated a new development path for human society. It is a holistic approach that embodies China's wisdom and vision in global governance, foreign scholars said on Tuesday.

The comment comes after China on Tuesday released a white paper entitled "A Global Community of Shared Future: China's Proposals and Actions." The white paper, which summarizes the meaning of building a global community of shared future, its practices and development, is released at the 10th anniversary of China's proposal about building the global community of a shared future.

"In the past decade, globalization has seen signs of retreating, due to US-inflicted trade war, tech barrier and unilateral sanctioning, which mirrors that the West-led international order is purely based on Western interests. Against this backdrop, the global community has been in urgent need for a new governing system," Wirun Phichaiwongphakdee, director of the Thailand-China Research Center of the Belt and Road Initiative, told the Global Times.

Countries, especially the Global South, wanted to change the current system, which is unfair and disproportionate. As a result, many countries are looking at China's proposal as an engine to boost their own economic recovery by aligning with it, Maya Majueran, director of Bel t&Road Initiative Sri Lanka (BRISL), told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The implementation of the concept of building a global community of shared future has entitled individual country with equal rights to development, and make the developing world able to lift them out of poverty and genuinely participate in global governance, Wirun said.

"It shows what China says that development is an inalienable right of all countries, not a privilege of just a few countries," Majueran said. He exemplified by various China-constructed BRI projects in Sri Lanka, which has led to a huge overhaul of Sri Lankan infrastructure which had dragged down its economic development for generations. BRI also helps Sri Lanka's economic growth, job creation and people's livelihood improvement, according to him.

Wirun took note of a number of BRI projects in Southeast Asia including the China-Thailand High-Speed Railway now being built, which he said demonstrates how China and the ASEAN are working together to build a community of shared future.

According to the white paper, China's vision of a global community of shared future has gained broader support over the past decade. To date, China has constructed community of shared future in different forms with dozens of countries and regions. China-proposed Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative have gained public support from more than 100 countries, while the Global Civilization Initiative has also received warm feedback from many countries.

"The concept is a major public good that China has provided to the world. And it is of vital importance that China's wisdom helps build more consensus, maintain peace, and allow more countries to participate in the building of a community of shared future for the mankind," Wirun added. 

Cambodia highly appreciated the current development of economic and trade cooperation with China, Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Aun Pornmoniroth told Xinhua in an interview on Friday.

Pornmoniroth, who is also the minister of economy and finance, said many infrastructure projects, technology transfer, and investments in Cambodia, which are a crucial source of economic growth, have been promoted under the Cambodia-China financial cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative.

The trade volume between the two countries is increasing yearly, even with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, he said. "It is believed to increase further in upcoming years."

Cambodia can export agricultural products to China directly, including bananas, mango, and longan, just to name a few, he added.

Besides, the Cambodia-China Free Trade Agreement (CCFTA) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement, which took effect in 2022, demonstrate the commitment of participating countries to safeguarding the multilateral trading system, maintaining economic openness, and upholding a spirit of cooperation, which will, in turn, enhance socio-economic development.

"Undoubtedly, the two agreements will largely contribute to Cambodia's graduation from its status as a least-developed country in the next five years and an achievement of Cambodia's vision to become an upper-middle-income country by 2030 and a high-income country by 2050," Pornmoniroth said.

He added that the bilateral economic and trade cooperation reached another significant level during the official visit of Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet to China, resulting in the signing of a crucial document, namely, the action plan on building a Cambodia-China community with a shared future in the new era (2024-2028).

Also, he said both countries agreed to enhance trade facilitation to promote high-quality development of bilateral economic and trade cooperation, including making full use of the CCFTA and RCEP, promoting e-commerce cooperation, China International Import Expo, China Import and Export Fair, China-ASEAN Expo, China International Consumer Products Expo, and China International Small and Medium Enterprises Fair, among others.

Pornmoniroth said the signed action plan emphasizes the key priority areas of cooperation, such as politics, production capacity, agriculture, energy, security, and people-to-people exchanges, called the Cambodia-China Diamond Hexagon cooperation framework.

He added that the action plan clearly reflects the two countries' commitment to deepening the building of a high quality, high level, and high standard Cambodia-China community with a shared future in the new era.